That our data are not ideally suited to a definitive study of the validityPSA is a valid screening test for prostate cancer, which compares favorably with mammography for breast cancer. However, until an effect on mortality has.Of the PSA test because no biopsies were performed and patients were not specificallyEvaluated for the development of prostate cancer over time.
Concerns relating to standards include user qualification, security of test content, confidentiality of test results, and the prevention of the misuse of tests and results. Standards of Test Construction and Test Use:A good test should be reliable and valid. Definition of Psychological Tests:"an objective and standardized measure of a sample of behavior."B. Test construction: Introduction and Overview A. Test construction: Introduction and OverviewI.
Validity And Reliability Of Psa Test Free From Error
A mastery test asses whether or not the person can attain a pre-specified mastery level of performance.Response sets include: social desirability (giving responses that are perceived to be socially acceptable), acquiescence (agreeing or disagreeing with everything, and deviation (giving unusual or uncommon responses).All of the above can threaten the validity of a given set of results.A test is reliable a) to the degree that it is free from error and provides information about examinees "true" test scores and b) to the degree that it provides repeatable, consistent results. A speed test, in which response rate is assessed.Iv. A test of typical performance (e.g., personality test) which tells us what a person usually does.Iii. A test of maximum performance (e.g., achievement test) which tells us what a person can do.Ii.
True-false) have lowered reliability coefficients.Content, criterion-related, and construct validity 1) content validity:A test has content validity if it measures knowledge of the content domain of which it was designed to measure knowledge. For e.g., all other things being equal, short tests are less reliable than long ones, very easy and very difficult tests are less reliable than moderately difficult tests, and tests where examinees scores are affected by guessing (e.g. Factors affecting the reliability coefficientAny factor which reduces score variability or increases measurement error will also reduce the reliability coefficient. Standard error of measurement.
A test has criterion-related validity if it is useful for predicting a persons behavior in a specified situation. " just cause it looks valid doesnt mean it is."Criterion-related validity is a concern for tests that are designed to predict someones status on an external criterion measure. Face validity is not a technical sense of test validity i.e., just b/c a test has face validity does not mean it will be valid in the technical sense of the word. Nevertheless, the test should have a high correlation w/other tests that purport to sample the same content domain.This is different from face validity: face validity is when a test appears valid to examinees who take it, personnel who administer it and other untrained observers. Content validity is primarily an issue for educational tests, certain industrial tests, and other tests of content knowledge like the Psychology Licensing Exam.Expert judgement (not statistics) is the primary method used to determine whether a test has content validity. For e.g., a comprehensive math achievement test would lack content validity if good scores depended primarily on knowledge of English, or if it only had questions about one aspect of math (e.g., algebra).
It is good diagnostic screening tests when you want to diagnose.In Predictive validation, the predictor scores are collected first and criterion data are collected at some later/future point. This kind of validation is appropriate for tests designed to asses a persons current criterion status. There are two types.In concurrent validation, the predictor and criterion data are collected at or about the same time.
2d) Factors affecting the criterion-related validity coefficient:This is about factors that potentially affect the magnitude of the criterion-related validity coefficient. When a predictor is to be used in this manner, the goal of the validation study is to set an optimal predictor cutoff score an examinee who scores at or above the predictor cutoff is predicted to score at or above the criterion cutoff.True positives (or valid acceptance): accurately identified by the predictor as meeting the criterion standardFalse positives (or false acceptance): incorrectly identified by the predictor as meeting the criterion standard.True negative (valid rejection): accurately identified by the predictor as not meeting the criterion standard.False negative (invalid rejection): meets the criterion standard, even though the predictor indicated s/he wouldnt. 2c) Decision-MakingIn many cases when using predictor tests, the goal is to predict whether or not a person will meet or exceed a minimum standard of criterion performance the criterion cutoff point. 2b) Standard Error of estimateThe standard error of estimate ( s est) is used to estimate the range in which a persons true score on a criterion is likely to fall, given his/her score as estimated by a predictor.
Note this is the only case when a low correlation coefficient (b/w two test that measure different traits) provides evidence of high validity.The multitrait-multimethod matrix is one way to assess a tests convergent and divergent validity. By contrast, a tests divergent validity is demonstrated through a low correlation with a test that measures a different construct. 3a) Convergent/divergent validationA test has convergent validity if it has a high correlation with another test that measures the same construct. There are a number of ways to establish construct validity.Two methods of establishing a tests construct validity are convergent/divergent validation and factor analysis. The construct validity of a test is worked out over a period of time on the basis of an accumulation of evidence. 3) Construct validityA test has construct validity if it accurately measures a theoretical, non-observable construct or trait.
This is evidence that the test is measuring a single constructAlso developmental changes. That is, if a test has construct validity, scores on the individual test items should correlate highly with the total test score. 3c) Other methods of assessing construct validity:We can asses the tests internal consistency. 3b) Factor analysisFactor analysis is a complex statistical procedure which is conducted for a variety of purposes, one of which is to assess the construct validity of a test or a number of tests.
The former focuses on issues related to the content of the test, eg. Item analysis can be both qualitative and quantitative. Item analysis is used to help "build" reliability and validity are "into" the test from the start. 4) Relationship between reliability and validityIf a test is unreliable, it cannot be valid.For a test to be valid, it must reliable.However, just because a test is reliable does not mean it will be valid.Reliability is a necessary but not sufficient condition for validity!There are a variety of techniques for performing an item analysis, which is often used, for example, to determine which items will be kept for the final version of a test.
Interpretation of Test Scores 1.
0 kommentar(er)
